Former MI5 chief warns food supplies are matter of national security

The UK should increase visas for seasonal workers as part of a drive to cultivate as much food as possible domestically, a former chief of MI5 has said.

Baroness Eliza Manningham-Buller, who led the domestic intelligence service from 2002 to 2007, said in a lecture that security of food supplies would fit within the government’s own definition of national security. She said she believed this meant strengthening domestic supply.

“We need to acknowledge that we should produce as much of our own food as we can, with due regard to sustainability, and be able to export what we can,” the former director-general of the Security Service told members of the National Farmers ‘ Union.

“Several people [have] said that [food security] was about just getting a secure food line from somewhere else. . . I’ve interpreted it differently,” Manningham-Buller said.

“We have a hope that we will continue to get food from our nearest neighbors as we get energy from them. But I think the more we can be self-sufficient, the better chances we have of standing price hikes, spikes, shocks and so on — and politics.”

Manningham-Buller, who now runs a small sheep farm in Wales, added: “[We] clearly need a better visa policy so that these workers who are not available here can come here and help us.

“We must have visas for seasonal workers. And it’s not just about [the food sector], there’s a shortage of labor across the economy, whether it’s care homes, whether it’s doctors and nurses . . . It shouldn’t be beyond our wit to develop a visa system that deals with that.”

Manningham-Buller’s intervention comes as the UK grapples with its post-Brexit food policy and after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine brought supply lines into the spotlight by risking international grain flows. She said this constituted a “weaponisation of food”.

UK farmers are pushing for a larger allocation of visas for seasonal workers to pick fruit and vegetables, saying that the current 40,000 tally falls far short of the 70,000-80,000 needed. But a succession of home secretaries has pushed back against increasing numbers as they seek to keep overall migration numbers down.

The free market Institute of Economic Affairs think-tank, whose ideas inform parts of the ruling Conservative party’s thinking, has meanwhile argued that agricultural policy should focus on UK farmers competing in global markets. Parliament’s environment, food and rural affairs committee is holding an inquiry into food security.

Manningham-Buller’s comments align her with the farming lobby, which has pushed for a strategic move to increase domestic food cultivation — which currently provides about 54 per cent of the UK’s supplies — and for post-Brexit farm subsidies to recognize the role of food production alongside environmental improvements.

The former MI5 head said she had overseen a doubling of the security service’s staffing and a drive to broaden the thinking of successive governments on national security, pushing other public bodies to consider its relevance to areas such as food.

Read More

Loco ‘local’ food law and Lewis and Clark

By Jeff Havens

Editor’s note: The Lewis and Clark Expedition, commissioned by President Thomas Jefferson, mapped and explored the Louisiana Purchase and areas West from 1804 to 1806, including the area from the Missouri River to the Pacific Ocean.

They were on the edge of starvation in the Bitterroot Mountains during mid-September 1805.

The 34 members of the Lewis and Clark expedition were so hungry they started eating their own horses. They also supplement the meat with canned “portable soup” on Sept. 14, 15, 16, 18, and 19 in that difficult year.

When Capt. Meriwether Lewis paid for canned soup in Philadelphia in May 1803, he could have never imagined his emergency food had a fair chance of killing all members of the expedition. This fact was largely dependent on whether the soup was boiled before consumption. To add to this difficulty, the emergency food was contained in lead canisters in which no oxygen could flow into the food.

This ignorance is comprehensible by today’s standards because science has yet to understand both germ theory and the negative health consequences of ingesting leads. In addition, scientists and food processors have no understanding of the deadliest known food poison: botulinum toxin.

Reasonable persons believe we have advanced well beyond early 19th-century ignorance, and in many ways, we have progressed. However, in some ways we are regressing, much to the detriment of public health.

Botulinum is a potent neurotoxin toxin. It is created under low-acid, low-oxygen environments, and cannot be detected by sight, smell or taste. One tablespoon of purified botulinum toxin has the potential to kill all humans on Earth, if an antitoxin is not administered, usually within the first 48 hours of symptom onset. In the worst circumstance, the toxin can be neutralized if the food is boiled prior to consumption for at least ten minutes, and longer at mountain altitudes.

This fact may have saved the expedition. as Pvt. Joseph Whitehouse suggested in his journal on Sept. 15, “we melted Snow to drink & make portable Soup.”

In 1803, Lewis had Chef Francois Baillet create a thick paste, consisting of water, beef chunks, egg whites, and chopped vegetables, known as “portable soup.” Baillet likely learned his food canning method indirectly through the efforts of French Chef Nicholas Appert who developed his canning process from 1799 to 1809. Appert packed foods into glass bottles, corked openings, and submerged the bottles in boiling water for times ranging from seven to 120 minutes. Appert eventually won a prize of 12,000 francs for his efforts in 1810 from emperor Napoleon Bonaparte of France.

Napoleon wanted a way to nourish troops for military campaigns.

The soup Lewis would buy today be classified as a low-acid canned food. Similar high-risk canned foods, to which substances like vinegar are added, are classified as acidified foods. Both of these foods are high-risk canned products, regulated by either the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the US Department of Agriculture (USDA).

Which agency has authority over high-risk canned food depends on two factors: the most relevant is whether the ingredients or product have been, or will be, subject to interstate commerce.

In the circumstance of the 2021 “Montana Local Food Choice Act,” the law bends over backwards to avoid USDA authority for both ingredients and products. However, it only does the same for FDA products. In other words, it’s impossible to legally reason that local “homemade” commercial food products using non-local ingredients are outside the FDA jurisdictional authority.

“Local” cannot also mean “nonlocal.” Worse, the law claims to be outside of consumer safety protections any reasonable person would expect from such homemade commercial foods.

One of the reasons for the extremely low number of incidents involving commercial foodborne botulism is that these foods have been subject to federal consumer safety standards.

If a state has no regulations or refuses to enforce regulations for high-risk canned foods, and the product includes interstate ingredients, the producer of that canned product is only exempt from the FDA’s emergency permit provision if they meet minimum standards. In such a circumstance, the FDA commissioner must investigate to determine whether to take emergency action on behalf of the public. Because most cases of botulism involve homemade food, it’s highly unlikely that any FDA commissioner would find an emergency permit provision that would not apply to Montana’s commercial homemade food law.

According to surveillance data from federal authorities, in the lower 49 states, the majority of botulism cases are attributed to homemade foods. For example, the most recent data available for 2018 indicated there were 17 laboratory-confirmed cases. Of the 17 cases, nine were attributed to homemade foods.

But this botulism risk is acceptable to Montana state Mon. Greg Hertz, Gov. Greg Gianforte, and state health department director Charles Brereton, who refuses to legally challenge

Read More

How long are they safe to keep and eat?

  • Most leftovers shouldn’t stay in the fridge for longer than three to four days, the federal food and health agencies say.
  • Leftovers that are stored in the freezer can last much longer. The USDA’s Food Safety Inspection Service pointing three to four months as a good limit.
  • When reheating leftovers, make sure the food reaches 165 degrees.

If you cooked a Thanksgiving feast last week, chances are you have plenty of leftovers. But don’t wait too long to eat or freeze them.

Cooked turkey and other leftovers can be kept in the fridge safely for about three to four days, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and FoodSafety.gov say.

But after that time, “the risk of food poisoning goes up,” the Mayo Clinic notes, pointing to the growth of bacteria in refrigerated leftovers.

This means that the Monday after Thanksgiving marks a “‘use or freeze’ deadline,” FoodSafety.gov says. If you don’t eat or freeze your leftovers by then, it’s safest to throw them away.

Here’s what you need to know.

CDC:Food poisoning has slightly dropped. But experts say it’s still a problem.

Does your state have a favorite Thanksgiving side dish? Google shares popular holiday searches

How long can leftovers stay in the fridge?

Again, most leftovers shouldn’t stay in the fridge for more than three to four days, the US Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service notes.

For more specifics, the USDA’s FSIS launched the FoodKeeper app, which consumers can consult and use to set reminders when navigating if food is still safe to eat.

How long can leftovers be frozen?

If you store leftovers in the freezer, they will last longer. According to FoodSafety.gov, frozen leftovers “will be of best quality within 2-6 months.” USDA’s FSIS says three to four months is a good limit for frozen food.

“Although safe indefinitely, frozen leftovers can lose moisture and flavor when stored for longer times in the freezer,” USDA’s FSIS writes.

You might want to throw those leftovers:What to know about storing rice, noodles

Can I tell if refrigerated food is spoiled?

If food is left longer in the fridge than it should, sometimes it will develop a strange taste or smell from spoilage bacteria, FoodSafety.gov says. But it’s not always possible to tell.

Bacteria often don’t change a food’s appearance, taste or smell, the Mayo Clinic notes – making it hard to tell if food is safe to eat.

How soon should I store my food after eating it?

There’s not just a deadline for how long food lasts in the fridge. After cooking and eating your holiday meal, it’s best to store it as soon as possible.

Leftovers should be refrigerated or frozen within two hours of cooking food, the CDC and FoodSafety.gov say.

“Seventy-six percent of respondents in a recent USDA study said they would refrigerate leftovers after letting them cool to room temperature first. This is not necessary and could actually make your food unsafe,” FoodSafety.gov wrote. “Leftovers should be placed in the refrigerator or freezer as soon as possible, even if they still have steam or heat coming off of them.”

Are you grilling your burgers wrong? How to prepare that barbecue safely.

While it’s not necessary to wait for food to cool completely, there are some tips to help your food cool faster. When storing large dishes like a roast turkey, for example, The USDA’s FSIS recommends dividing the leftovers into smaller portions across shallow containers.

What about re-heating leftovers?

Make sure to reheat leftovers to 165 degrees before eating them, the USDA notes. You can check the temperature using a food thermometer.

Frozen leftovers need to be thawed before cooking – but don’t just leave them to thaw on the counter, notes the Mayo Clinic. You can thaw leftovers in the fridge, microwave, or with a leakproof container under cold water.

What’s everyone talking about? Sign up for our trending newsletter to get the latest news of the day

And again, after thawing, you have three to four days to eat or refreeze your food, the USDA notes.

Contributing: Marina Pitofsky, USA TODAY.

Read More